I'm participating in a "syncro-blog" facilitated by Zack Hunt over at The American Jesus blog. For the entire week, bloggers across America will be sharing their thoughts on the upcoming election, particularly who they believe Christians should vote for and why.
Most who know me know that I
generally steer clear of writing any significant political commentary in the
public forum. But it seems as though, I just can’t hold this one in. My heart hurts for
us/U.S. I’ve often said that I’m an independent with conservatively liberal
tendencies. LOL! Yet, in this election, I’m certainly, and most definitely not
undecided. So here I go…jumping in the fray.
It’s astounding to me how the
so-called “religious right” can, in one breath, thrash President Obama about
issues they believe are integral to the faith and yet in the next breath,
endorse a candidate that doesn’t believe in the FOUNDATIONAL principle of our
faith: that it is by grace through faith that one receives salvation. Even the
Billy Graham organization has decided to remove Mormonism from its list of
cults, only after Graham met with Mitt Romney, the Republican candidate for
President and devout Mormon.
Seriously?
I'm not telling you who to vote
for. But please be clear...to use God’s word as a tool for political gain is
worse than the Roman soldiers who cast lots (2012 translation: shot dice) for Christ’s
clothes after His body was removed from the cross.
You see, I’m fine with a person deciding
that Christian principles are the values by which one should make political
decisions. We all have that right and quite frankly, to some extent, all of us
vote based on some hierarchy of values we claim to espouse. I say hierarchy
because the political process is inherently an exercise in compromise (a
definite challenge for believers who understand that God’s word should not ever
be compromised). And yet…if I wanted a candidate that aligned with every one of
my values, I’d be better off writing my mother in on the ballot. And if even
then, it wouldn’t work. (Sorry, Mom!) :)
But what is reprehensible to me
is when some people will cherry-pick the principles and issues they want to fly
on their political banner and then turn around and disrespect the office that
God has ordained a person to serve in (Yep, God ordained him, read Romans 13)…simply
because their “must haves” don’t align with his “must haves.” If you are
claiming to be standing firmly and rigidly on the word of God, you’d certainly
better consider the implications of choosing a candidate who has stood on an
evangelistic mission field and preached against the CORE of what you say you
believe.
(And let’s be clear: Mormons
believe many things that are diametrically opposed to the teachings in the
Bible. Things such as (1) that God and Jesus were separate physical people who
dwelled on the earth. God was Jesus' father and both men died (2) There is no
hell…just three heavens, and you get into them depending on if you are a Mormon
or not, if you are a good person but never a Mormon, or if you are a good
Mormon who lives a righteous life. (3) Lucifer was Jesus' brother, back on the
original earth, where God and Jesus dwelled and that (4) the bible is the word
of God as far as it is translated correctly but that the Book of Mormon is the
word of God.)*
I’ve had some of my Republican
friends say to me that, in this case,
religion and faith don’t matter. But it certainly mattered when Rev. Jeremiah
Wright was being demonized for preaching from the pulpit about the VERY REAL
residue of America’s history on modern social policies. It certainly mattered
when some people were (and are) trying to make the current President a Muslim
despite evidence to the contrary.
And don’t rejoice too quickly, my
left-leaning friends…. as a follower of Christ, I am concerned about issues
like gay marriage and abortion. I believe that Jesus is deeply troubled by the 4,000
babies lost to abortion each day. BUT…He is ALSO deeply troubled by the state
of the hearts and minds and circumstances of the 4,000 mothers who felt like,
for whatever reason, they needed to make that choice. Jesus’ GRACE is sufficient
for BOTH.
But here’s the rub for me…I know
FOR CERTAIN that he is deeply troubled by the 22,000 children who die from
poverty each day GLOBALLY; approx. 10,000 children a year in a country as
wealthy as ours (Don’t think we’re so wealthy? Ask the people who waited in line
for the iPhone 5). In fact…don’t take my word for it:
Give to him who
asks of you, and do not turn away from him who wants to borrow from you. - Mt.
5:42.
"When you give
a luncheon or a dinner, do not invite your friends or your brothers or your
relatives or rich neighbors, lest they also invite you in return, and repayment
come to you. But when you give a reception, invite the poor, the crippled, the
lame, the blind, and you will be blessed, since they do not have the means to
repay you; for you will be repaid at the resurrection of the righteous." -
Luke 14:12-14.
The young man said
to Him, "All these commands I have kept; what am I still lacking?"
Jesus said to him, "If you wish to be complete, go and sell your
possessions and give to the poor, and you shall have treasure in heaven; and
come, follow Me." - Mt. 19:20
He who is gracious
to a poor man lends to the LORD, and He will repay him for his good deed. - Prov.
19:17.
"If anyone has
material possessions and sees his brother in need but has no pity on him, how
can the love of God be in him? Dear children, let us not love with words or
tongue but with actions and in truth." 1 John 3:17-18
Are these commands/scriptures not
just as important? Can anyone honestly say that the policies promoted by the
“religious right” faction of the GOP take any of the above into consideration?
This is what I would challenge
anyone who classifies themselves as part of this group to think about in this
election: If President Obama, after having some kind of strange revelation, decided
that the policies the GOP were putting forth were right; even decided to change
his agenda to match said policies (God forbid), would you STILL have a problem
with him being in the White House? If your answer is YES, then I would suggest
that your issue with him has NOTHING to do with faith or religion, policies or
record; or even his character. It’s something more insidious and rooted in the more
wretched aspects of American history. And if you are a believer like you say, I
would also encourage you to thank God that He has allowed this political
climate to reveal your true heart…and REPENT. Then and only then will the
causes you choose to champion—some of which may change as a result of your
repentance—be viewed as authentic
concerns and not ridiculous political manipulations designed to further your
own selfish agendas.
Trust and believe, God is neither
republican nor democrat. In fact, I'm reminded of a great quote from blogger
Mark Rosenfelder, "God isn't a conservative; He's a revolutionary. He not
only takes the side of the poor; he puts himself in their place." God IS “the
least of these (Matthew 25:37-40).” And if there is nothing on the GOP agenda
that even remotely attempts to serve them first and foremost (i.e.,
healthcare, education, Medicare, etc.) then the God being claimed as the source
of the party’s “family values” looks nothing like the God of the Bible and the
God I serve.
*
http://www.christianpost.com/news/what-do-mormons-believe-ex-mormon-speaks-out-part-two-58494/
Your thoughts?

3 comments:
I digs. Good sage commentary on the troubling aspects of evangelicalism gone rogue. I'm increasingly concerned that much of what we deem biblical Christianity is not biblical at all but a projection of our cultural perspectives and preference. Bravo, Tracey for pointing this out.
- PJ
He's a black man in the White House in America. He did what some others didn't approve of and was successful. In America it will always be race and wealth that will
keep us separated whether those in charge do a good job or not. It has to be one for all. Not just a certain percentaage.
The religious right does take into account the needy in our own borders-- and puts those needs directly where they belong-- into the hands of the church. The job of the government (the BIBLICAL) definition is to rule so that people can lead peaceful lives. It is to control unruliness and crime. It is not to create a welfare state. It is definitely not to fund abortion and the homosexual agenda. If the church were caring for the needy the way it's supposed to, there would be less poverty. You are confusing issues-- Mormonism is not Christianity, but it 's a far cry from the basic directive of Islam, which is to kill infidels, (CHristians)) and Obama is an Islamist. We did not have a good republican candidate to vote for, but a vote for Obama is a vote to perpetuate the systematic destruction and undermining of the Christian foundations of this country. Shame, shame, shame on the church for allowing this anti-Christian into the most powerful office of this country.
Post a Comment